|
|
|
Click Looking
Through an Anti-Racist Lens By Enid Lee
When
examining cases of racism and inequity in schools, we often
explain them in terms of lack of individual effort, bad
luck, human nature or the inevitability of inequality.
These explanations are not grounded in a social understanding
of events and processes.
In contrast, viewing the same cases through an anti-racist
lens allows us to see how the use of power by individuals,
communities and institutions has brought about the current
situation. We
can see how power is used to make change or to keep things
the way they are, particularly with regard to the issues of
rights, respect, resources, and representation based on skin
color. An
anti-racist lens leads us to look at the historical roots
for both explanations and solutions.
I work in many schools throughout the United States and Canada
assisting teachers, students, parents, support staff and
administrators to confront and dismantle systems and
structures that promote racism.
These structures contribute to inequitable educational
outcomes for all children.
Over the years, I have developed the practice of looking at
the situations I find in schools through an anti-racist
lens. Whether
we are aware of it or not, each of us looks through a
particular set of lenses.
I prefer to use a lens instead of a checklist since a
checklist can sometimes be too linear, not sufficiently
sensitive to context. A
lens on the other hand, with its curved sides, has the
capacity to disperse light rays into the many dark areas
that always surround cases of racism.
I will outline what I see when I look through an anti-racist
lens and invite you to use this lens when you look at
situations in your school. On
looking through an anti-racist lens, I am able to see how
skin color, shade, texture of hair and shape of eyes
influence the opportunities we have in life, the rights we
enjoy and the access we have to resources and the
representation and respect we receive.
The anti-racist lens helps me to bring a historical and
political perspective to solving problems and to
understanding the roots of these problems.
I can see how the ways in which we have organized our lives
and our institutions, around race and other identities, have
brought us to our present positions.
These other identities include language, nationality,
immigration status, culture and faith, which are often
racialized.
The anti-racist lens helps me to get at the ideas that support
and justify practices which treat some people, based on
their skin color, as superior and more deserving, while
treating other people as inferior and less deserving.
The most important feature of the anti-racist lens is that it
leads me to see how situations can be transformed and how
injustices can be reversed.
It draws my attention to the ways in which power can be used
and is used at the individual, community and institutional
levels for change. It
reminds me that educational failure is not inevitable and
that we can bring about justice in our classrooms.
Signposts
There are several signposts I see when I look through this
lens. They are: (1)
Representation
and roles in terms of racial group membership. Appearances
and accents of those engaged in any activity. Leaders
and supports in terms of racial group membership. Absences
in terms of racial group membership. (2)
History
and human agency. The
official and unofficial versions of the actions undertaken
by individuals, communities and institutions which brought
about this state of affairs. The
accounts of resistance to injustice. (3)
Ideology
and interests. Images,
statements, accounts and beliefs that are evoked to justify
and maintain current situations. Identification
of those who benefit and those who lose from current
situations. Structures,
systems, and sources of power. Arrangements,
patterns, processes, policies, procedures and traditions in
organizations and schools in particular.
These are the concrete ways in which things happen. People
and committees responsible for making decisions.
When you look at these places and these people racism ceases
to become a mystery. We
see how it happens. (4)
Hope
and human agency. Accounts
of the ways in which human beings have used and are using
the power they have as individuals, as members of groups and
as employees in institutions to bring about racial justice,
to maintain that justice once it is achieved, and to
encourage others to join them to work in this area.
In
order to deal with the particular situations in schools and
other organizations in light of the signposts listed above,
I have developed a cluster of questions and actions that
help me work with strategy competence in the contexts in
which we encounter racism.
These questions and activities have been used by teachers,
parents and students as they look through an anti-racist
lens to critically analyze and act upon situations in their
schools.
It is important to note that we can also apply other lenses
when looking at issues of equity in schools.
For examples, sometimes the lenses of class or gender must be
brought in focus because of the context.
I have found, in my work however, that even when I work with
the lenses of gender and class, I often gain a greater
understanding of the situations before me when I insert the
race lens over the lens of gender or class.
For instance, when I am trying to understand why such
negativity is being expressed against working class parents
and their assumed lack of interest in their childrens
education, and I discover that those parents are African
American, African Canadian, Native American, Native Canadian
or Latino. I
can raise the delicate question of race and help the
discussion move forward to a more positive place. Using
the Lens: Questions for Reflection and Action Critical
Analysis (1)
What is the specific issue being addressed? Who
is involved in terms of race, language, class, gender and
other aspects of identity? (2)
How did things get to be the way they are? What
were some of the needs and strengths identified?
Who identified them as needs and strengths?
What actions were undertaken or not undertaken by individuals,
community, and institutions in the recent past and in the
distant past that brought about this situation?
What were the terms under which actions were undertaken?
Who established those terms?
Who knew about them and who did not? (3)
What are some of the beliefs (prevailing ideologies) that have
led to this situation? What
are the beliefs that are held by those in power and by those
without the power about the ability and worth of particular
racial backgrounds? What
are the explanations that are presented to justify actions
and the positions of privilege or disadvantage that members
of different racial groups enjoy or endure?
(4)
What are some things that keep the situation the way it is? Has
there been a conscious examination of the experiences of
people of color with respect to the issue?
Has there been an examination of the impact of school policies
and practices, connected with communication for example, on
parents and students and faculty of various racial
backgrounds?
How
has the institutional silence on these matters helped to
maintain the status quo?
How has the lack of material, financial, and/or human
resources contributed to the situation?
How has an inadequate time commitment resulted in the
situation remaining unchanged? (5)
Which
groups in society benefit or lose from the present
situation? Which
individuals and communities resources (cultural,
spiritual, intellectual and financial) increase or decrease
because of this situation? Where
and how are the voices and vies of members of various racial
groups represented or excluded in this present situation?
How are the rights to self-determination of racial communities
ensured? How
are we challenging the pattern and practice of one community
or member of a racial group speaking for and determining the
activities and direction for another community or member of
another racial group? Who,
in terms of racial group membership, is feeling respected
and validated and treated with human dignity?
Who, in terms of racial group membership, is experiencing a
sense of inherent superiority and of deserving all the
privileges they enjoy? (6)
What
would I have to change in order for the situation to be
different? Based
on the responses to the questions above, I develop a
strategic plan to address the roots of the problem.
I gather information about the experiences of those who have
been marginalized and those who have been validated by the
processes. I
disseminate that information through all technologies at my
disposal. I,
along with others, expose the sources of power and decision
making.
With all concerned constituencies, especially those who have
been formally excluded, we redefine needs, strengths and
resources. Together
we redefine and redistribute roles, responsibilities and
resources for greater equity to the extent that we are able,
well aware that facing resistance and reversals are part of
the process of making change towards racial equality.
We publicize and celebrate whatever gains we make along the
way as a means of encouraging ourselves and others. (7)
Where
can I find allies? I
cast about with my anti-racist lens and I see that allies
are everywhere. I
make a list of all the people who have a vested interest in
addressing the situation.
I look to my colleagues who say they want our organization to
work well, who say they want all students to succeed.
I turn to those who work for social justice.
I appeal to those whose reputation for excellence makes them
likely partners in the struggle for equality.
If you are good at what you do, let everyone experience
it.
I look to parents of color and all of those who want their
children to have access to the best quality education.
I also look to parents who are White who see the situation as
a matter of justice and who also feel that their
childrens lives are enriched by racial, cultural and
linguistic diversity. I
see allies among those parents, students and teachers who
have been victimized because of some form of difference
gender, sexual orientation, class, etc.
I turn to the grassroots, race-specific and academic
organizations in the community.
I see as some of my greatest allies those who have gone before
and have struggled and resisted racism.
As a woman of African descent working between Canada and the
United States, I turn often to my ally Harriet Tubman who
did much anti-racist work between these two countries.
She led Africans out of one kind of bondage from the United
States into what others might describe as another kind of
bondage in Canada. Nevertheless,
as my ally, I feel her legacy of perseverance. (8)
What kind of work can we do in the many spheres of influence
in which we operate? Interpersonal
basis with one person: colleague to colleague, student to
student, parent to parent. Class
level with all students through formal curriculum. Department
or faculty-level at a faculty or staff meeting. Parent
gatherings and student gatherings. Meeting
with administration and other authorities. School
community: unions, associations and clubs. People
in other schools through networks including chat lines and
e-mail connections. Organizations,
institutions and individuals outside the schools. Lawmakers:
school trustees, city councilors. Media:
newsletters, newspapers, television, tapes, CD-ROMS, websites
in various languages. (8)
How
can we institutionalize this change?
How can we prevent this situation from reoccurring? Monitor,
monitor, monitor! Keep
good records. Check
all systems to ensure that outcomes are realized. Ensure
that the issue is inserted at the policy and procedural
levels. Remind
everyone that intent is not what counts; it is outcome that
matters. Remind
everyone that until every person, regardless of racial
background, is experiencing equality in the areas of
respect, rights to self-determination and full humanity,
representation and resources, we still have a job to do. Keep
hopeful by looking at and learning from others who have
worked on and are working on these issues all around the
world. Always
celebrate what has been accomplished to date. |